Medical School · Year 3 · Psychiatry · includes a quiz and discussion video

Seminar 03: Bipolar and Related Disorders

Year 3: Psychiatry Clerkship

Learning Objectives

By the end of this seminar, students will be able to:

1. Differentiate bipolar I, II, and cyclothymia
2. Diagnose manic and hypomanic episodes
3. Identify mixed features and rapid cycling
4. Select appropriate mood stabilizers
5. Manage acute mania and bipolar depression
6. Recognize the importance of maintenance therapy

Seminar Outline

I. Overview and Epidemiology

Bipolar disorder represents a chronic, recurrent mood disorder characterized by episodes of mania, hypomania, and depression that cause significant functional impairment and carry substantial morbidity and mortality. The lifetime prevalence of bipolar I disorder is approximately one to two percent, while bipolar II disorder and the broader bipolar spectrum affect an additional two to three percent of the population, making bipolar conditions a significant public health concern. Unlike unipolar depression with its female predominance, bipolar I disorder affects men and women equally, though bipolar II disorder may be somewhat more common in women. The typical age of onset falls in late adolescence to early adulthood, with peak onset between fifteen and twenty-five years.

The clinical course of bipolar disorder varies considerably across individuals but follows recognizable patterns. Manic episodes in bipolar I disorder typically last weeks to months if untreated, while depressive episodes tend to be longer, often lasting several months. Patients spend substantially more time in depressive episodes than in manic or hypomanic episodes, a pattern that contributes to diagnostic delay since initial presentations are often depressive. The average delay from symptom onset to accurate diagnosis ranges from five to ten years. Between episodes, many patients achieve full remission, though subsyndromal symptoms and functional impairment often persist, contributing to ongoing disability.

The etiology of bipolar disorder involves substantial genetic contribution, with heritability estimates approaching eighty percent, among the highest of any psychiatric condition. First-degree relatives have approximately ten times the risk of developing bipolar disorder compared to the general population. Twin studies demonstrate concordance rates of forty to seventy percent for monozygotic twins compared to five to ten percent for dizygotic twins. Genome-wide association studies have identified multiple risk loci, though individual variants contribute only small effects. Environmental factors including childhood adversity, stressful life events, and sleep disruption interact with genetic vulnerability to influence onset and course.

The suicide risk in bipolar disorder is among the highest of any psychiatric condition, with twenty-five to fifty percent of patients attempting suicide during their lifetime and fifteen to twenty percent dying by suicide if untreated. This elevated mortality risk underscores the importance of accurate diagnosis and effective treatment. Comorbidity is extremely common, with substance use disorders affecting over fifty percent of patients and anxiety disorders affecting forty to sixty percent. These comorbidities complicate treatment and worsen prognosis. The kindling hypothesis suggests that episodes may beget episodes over time, with the illness becoming more autonomous and less tied to precipitating stressors.



II. Manic Episode Criteria

The DSM-5 criteria for a manic episode require a distinct period of abnormally and persistently elevated, expansive, or irritable mood and increased activity or energy lasting at least one week or requiring hospitalization. The mood disturbance must be present most of the day, nearly every day during this period. The inclusion of increased activity or energy as a required criterion in DSM-5 represents an important change from earlier editions, reflecting research demonstrating the centrality of activation symptoms to the manic syndrome. The one-week duration requirement may be waived if hospitalization becomes necessary before one week has elapsed.

During the period of mood disturbance and increased energy, at least three additional symptoms must be present at a significant degree, or four if mood is only irritable. The mnemonic DIGFAST captures these symptoms effectively. Distractibility describes easy diversion of attention to unimportant stimuli. Indiscretion refers to excessive involvement in pleasurable activities with high potential for painful consequences, such as spending sprees, sexual indiscretions, or foolish business investments. Grandiosity involves inflated self-esteem or feelings of special powers or abilities. Flight of ideas describes the subjective experience of racing thoughts, often accompanied by rapid speech. Activity increase refers to heightened goal-directed activity or psychomotor agitation. Sleep decrease indicates reduced need for sleep, feeling rested after only a few hours. Talkativeness manifests as pressured speech that is difficult to interrupt.

The severity threshold for manic episodes requires marked impairment in social or occupational functioning, necessitating hospitalization, or the presence of psychotic features. This severity requirement distinguishes mania from hypomania, which by definition does not cause marked impairment or require hospitalization. Psychotic features occur in fifty to seventy-five percent of manic episodes and typically involve grandiose or persecutory themes consistent with the elevated mood state. Mood-congruent psychotic features such as grandiose delusions about special powers or mission carry better prognosis than mood-incongruent features such as bizarre delusions.

The clinical presentation of mania encompasses multiple domains beyond the cardinal mood symptoms. Mood may be euphoric, irritable, or labile, often shifting rapidly within the episode. Behavior becomes impulsive with excessive spending, sexual indiscretions, and risky decisions. Speech is characteristically pressured, loud, and rapid, often difficult to interrupt. Thought content reflects grandiosity and may become paranoid, particularly when grandiose plans are challenged. The decreased need for sleep is notable in that patients feel fully rested after only a few hours rather than simply having insomnia with subsequent fatigue. Energy is markedly increased with hyperactivity that may continue for extended periods.



III. Hypomanic Episode and Bipolar II

Hypomanic episodes share the same symptom criteria as manic episodes but differ critically in duration requirement and severity threshold. The duration criterion for hypomania requires at least four consecutive days rather than the one week required for mania. The same three additional symptoms from the DIGFAST criteria must be present, or four if mood is only irritable. The episode must represent an unequivocal change in functioning that is observable by others and uncharacteristic of the individual when not symptomatic. Critically, the episode must not cause marked impairment in social or occupational functioning and must not necessitate hospitalization. If psychotic features are present, the episode automatically qualifies as manic rather than hypomanic regardless of duration or functional impact.

Distinguishing hypomania from normal mood variation presents a significant clinical challenge. Many patients experience hypomania as a pleasant, productive state and may not report it as problematic or even recognize it as abnormal. During hypomanic periods, patients may feel especially creative, energetic, and social, leading them to view these times positively rather than as symptoms of illness. Collateral information from family members or significant others proves invaluable for identifying hypomanic episodes that patients themselves may view positively or minimize. Direct questioning should explore whether there have been periods when the patient felt so good or energized that others thought they were not their usual self.

Bipolar II disorder requires at least one hypomanic episode and at least one major depressive episode, with the absence of any lifetime manic episodes. The diagnosis of bipolar II should not be viewed as a milder form of bipolar I, as patients with bipolar II often experience severe depressive episodes, paradoxically higher suicide rates than bipolar I, and comparable functional impairment. Individuals with bipolar II spend even more time in depressive episodes relative to hypomanic episodes compared to bipolar I, contributing to significant suffering and disability. Bipolar II is frequently misdiagnosed as unipolar depression because patients typically present during depressive episodes and may not report or recognize prior hypomanic periods.

Cyclothymic disorder represents a chronic, fluctuating mood disturbance involving numerous periods of hypomanic and depressive symptoms that do not meet full criteria for hypomanic or major depressive episodes. The symptoms must be present for at least two years in adults or one year in children and adolescents, with symptom-free intervals not exceeding two months. Cyclothymic disorder often precedes development of bipolar I or II disorder and may represent a temperamental predisposition or early stage of the illness. Distinguishing cyclothymia from normal mood variability requires documenting that the fluctuations cause clinically significant distress or impairment. Treatment approaches generally follow guidelines for bipolar disorder, though evidence specific to cyclothymic disorder remains limited.



IV. Mixed Features and Rapid Cycling

Mixed features describe the presence of symptoms from the opposite pole during a mood episode, creating a complex clinical picture with important treatment and prognostic implications. DSM-5 replaced the previous mixed episode category with a mixed features specifier applicable to both manic or hypomanic episodes and depressive episodes. For a manic or hypomanic episode with mixed features, at least three depressive symptoms must be present during most days of the episode, including symptoms such as depressed mood, diminished interest, psychomotor retardation, fatigue, worthlessness, or suicidal ideation. For a depressive episode with mixed features, at least three manic or hypomanic symptoms must be present, including elevated mood, grandiosity, talkativeness, flight of ideas, increased energy, or increased activity.

The clinical significance of mixed features extends beyond phenomenological description to critical treatment implications and prognosis. Episodes with mixed features carry substantially higher suicide risk than pure episodes, making accurate identification clinically essential. The combination of depressed mood with manic activation creates a particularly dangerous state in which patients have the negative cognitions and suicidal ideation of depression combined with the energy and impulsivity of mania. Mixed presentations respond less well to lithium monotherapy and may require atypical antipsychotics or valproate. Antidepressant monotherapy should be strictly avoided in mixed presentations due to destabilization risk.

Rapid cycling represents a course specifier with significant treatment implications, defined as four or more mood episodes within a twelve-month period. Episodes must be demarcated by either a switch to an episode of opposite polarity or by a period of at least two months without symptoms meeting criteria for a mood episode. Rapid cycling occurs in approximately ten to twenty percent of bipolar patients and is more common in women and in patients with hypothyroidism. Rapid cycling is associated with earlier onset, longer illness duration, and more frequent depressive episodes. This pattern responds less well to lithium and may be induced or exacerbated by antidepressants, which should generally be avoided or discontinued.

Additional specifiers in DSM-5 provide further characterization of bipolar episodes to guide treatment. The anxious distress specifier indicates prominent anxiety symptoms including feeling keyed up, unusual restlessness, difficulty concentrating due to worry, fear of something awful happening, or feeling loss of control. Anxiety complicates treatment and worsens prognosis. The peripartum onset specifier applies to episodes occurring during pregnancy or within four weeks of delivery and carries particular implications for medication selection given teratogenicity concerns. Seasonal pattern indicates regular temporal relationship between episode onset and particular seasons. Course specifiers including current episode type and severity ratings communicate clinical status and treatment needs.



V. Distinguishing Bipolar from Unipolar Depression

Distinguishing bipolar from unipolar depression has critical treatment implications, as antidepressant monotherapy may destabilize bipolar patients by inducing mania, accelerating cycling, or worsening mixed features. At initial presentation with a depressive episode, careful assessment for history of manic or hypomanic symptoms helps prevent misdiagnosis. Because patients often do not spontaneously report hypomanic symptoms, which may be experienced positively or not recognized as abnormal, direct questioning about periods of elevated mood, decreased sleep with preserved energy, increased productivity, or uncharacteristic risk-taking behaviors is essential. Collateral information from family members provides invaluable perspective.

Clinical features that suggest bipolar rather than unipolar depression include earlier age of onset with typical bipolar onset in late teens to early twenties compared to mid-twenties for unipolar depression. More abrupt onset and offset of episodes characterizes bipolar depression compared to the more gradual course typical of unipolar depression. Higher episode frequency and greater treatment resistance suggest bipolarity. Psychotic features during a depressive episode are more common in bipolar depression. Atypical depressive features including hypersomnia, hyperphagia, and leaden paralysis occur more frequently in bipolar depression. Family history of bipolar disorder strongly suggests bipolar rather than unipolar depression.

The phenomenon of antidepressant-induced mood elevation provides diagnostic information but also represents a treatment complication requiring careful management. When a patient develops manic or hypomanic symptoms during antidepressant treatment, the symptoms may represent medication-induced effects or unmasking of underlying bipolarity. DSM-5 allows diagnosis of bipolar disorder when a full manic or hypomanic syndrome emerges during antidepressant treatment if symptoms persist beyond the physiological effects of the medication. Regardless of diagnostic classification, such patients typically require mood stabilizer treatment, discontinuation of the antidepressant, and careful long-term monitoring for future mood instability.

Structured screening instruments support identification of bipolarity in patients presenting with depression. The Mood Disorder Questionnaire comprises thirteen yes-no items about lifetime manic symptoms plus questions about co-occurrence of symptoms at the same time and functional impact. A positive screen requires endorsement of seven or more symptoms, confirmation that several occurred at the same time, and moderate to serious problems caused by symptoms. While sensitivity and specificity are imperfect, the MDQ helps ensure systematic questioning about hypomanic symptoms that patients might not spontaneously report. Positive screens should prompt comprehensive diagnostic interview; screening instruments do not replace clinical assessment.



VI. Acute Mania Treatment

Acute mania frequently requires hospitalization given the severity of impairment, lack of insight, potential for dangerous behavior, and difficulty ensuring medication adherence in the community setting. Goals of acute treatment include ensuring safety for the patient and others, reducing agitation and distress, promoting sleep restoration, and initiating mood stabilization that will continue into maintenance treatment. The treatment setting should provide structure and safety, reduce environmental stimulation that may worsen symptoms, and allow close monitoring of behavior, vital signs, and medication response. Family involvement assists with gathering collateral information about symptom history and severity and planning for post-discharge care and monitoring.

First-line pharmacological treatment for acute mania includes mood stabilizers and atypical antipsychotics, which may be used alone or in combination depending on severity and clinical features. Lithium provides both acute antimanic effects and prophylactic effects, with therapeutic levels between zero point eight and one point two milliequivalents per liter for acute treatment. However, lithium may require one to two weeks to achieve full antimanic effect. Valproate reaches antimanic levels more quickly than lithium through loading strategies and may be preferred when rapid stabilization is needed. Atypical antipsychotics including risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, aripiprazole, and ziprasidone all demonstrate antimanic efficacy with generally faster onset than mood stabilizers.

Combination treatment with a mood stabilizer plus atypical antipsychotic is more effective than either alone for severe mania and represents the recommended approach for patients with more severe presentations. The combination provides both the rapid symptom control of antipsychotics and the stabilizing and prophylactic effects of mood stabilizers. Benzodiazepines serve as important adjunctive treatments for agitation and insomnia, with lorazepam commonly used given its flexibility of administration routes. Sleep restoration represents a critical therapeutic target given the role of sleep deprivation in perpetuating and worsening mania. However, benzodiazepines should be tapered once the mood stabilizer takes effect to avoid dependence.

If a patient is taking antidepressants when mania develops, they should generally be tapered and discontinued to facilitate mood stabilization. Antidepressant continuation during acute mania may impede stabilization, prolong the episode, and worsen long-term outcome through acceleration of cycling. Abrupt discontinuation may be problematic with some agents, particularly paroxetine and venlafaxine, which have discontinuation syndromes, so gradual taper may be necessary. Electroconvulsive therapy provides a highly effective option for severe or refractory mania, mania with significant medical complications, or mania during pregnancy when medication options are limited by teratogenicity concerns.



VII. Bipolar Depression Treatment

Bipolar depression presents substantial treatment challenges, as conventional antidepressant approaches carry risks and evidence-based options remain more limited than for unipolar depression. Patients spend far more time in depressive than manic phases, making effective depression treatment critical for reducing overall illness burden and improving quality of life. The suicide risk is highest during depressive and mixed episodes, underscoring the importance of aggressive treatment. Treatment goals include symptom remission, functional recovery, and prevention of mood destabilization through mania or accelerated cycling. Treatment selection must balance efficacy against destabilization risk.

First-line treatments for bipolar depression include medications with demonstrated efficacy that do not carry high destabilization risk. Quetiapine has FDA approval for bipolar I and II depression as monotherapy and represents an excellent first-line option. Lurasidone has approval for bipolar depression either as monotherapy or adjunctive to lithium or valproate and must be taken with food for adequate absorption. The olanzapine-fluoxetine combination has FDA approval for bipolar depression, providing both antidepressant efficacy and mood stability, though metabolic concerns including weight gain limit enthusiasm for long-term use. Lamotrigine shows efficacy for bipolar depression prevention and modest acute effects, though the slow titration required to reduce risk of Stevens-Johnson syndrome limits acute utility.

The role of conventional antidepressants in bipolar depression remains controversial and requires careful consideration of risks and benefits. When antidepressants are used, they should generally be combined with a mood stabilizer to reduce destabilization risk. SSRIs and bupropion carry lower switching risk than tricyclic antidepressants and SNRIs. Antidepressant use in bipolar I disorder carries greater destabilization risk than in bipolar II disorder. Antidepressants should be avoided in patients with rapid cycling, recent manic episodes, or mixed features. If antidepressants are used and effective, most experts recommend discontinuation after remission rather than indefinite continuation, though optimal duration remains debated.

Treatment-resistant bipolar depression may require more aggressive or innovative approaches. Electroconvulsive therapy is highly effective for severe bipolar depression, including cases with psychotic features or treatment resistance, and should be considered earlier rather than later for severe presentations. Ketamine provides rapid-acting antidepressant effects through NMDA receptor antagonism, with emerging evidence supporting efficacy in bipolar depression similar to unipolar depression. Transcranial magnetic stimulation represents another option for treatment-resistant depression. Pramipexole, a dopamine agonist used for Parkinson disease, shows promise for bipolar depression. Modafinil and armodafinil may help with residual fatigue and cognitive symptoms. Light therapy may benefit patients with seasonal patterns.



VIII. Mood Stabilizers and Monitoring

Lithium remains the gold standard mood stabilizer with demonstrated efficacy for acute mania, depression prevention, and uniquely among psychiatric medications, suicide risk reduction. The mechanism involves multiple intracellular effects including GSK-3 beta inhibition and neuroprotective properties, though the precise therapeutic mechanism remains incompletely understood. Therapeutic levels for maintenance range from zero point six to one point zero milliequivalents per liter, with higher levels up to one point two used for acute mania. Common side effects include fine tremor, polyuria and polydipsia from nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, cognitive dulling, weight gain, acne, and hypothyroidism. The narrow therapeutic index means that toxicity can occur at levels only slightly above therapeutic, manifesting as coarse tremor, ataxia, confusion, seizures, and potentially death.

Lithium monitoring must be performed regularly to ensure therapeutic levels and detect toxicity and organ effects before serious complications develop. Baseline evaluation includes renal function with creatinine and BUN, thyroid function with TSH, calcium, and pregnancy test if applicable. Lithium levels should be drawn twelve hours post-dose, typically as morning trough levels before the first dose of the day. During initiation and dose adjustment, levels should be checked weekly until stable at a therapeutic level. Maintenance monitoring includes lithium levels every three to six months and renal and thyroid function every six to twelve months. Conditions affecting sodium and fluid balance including dehydration, NSAIDs, ACE inhibitors, and thiazide diuretics can precipitate toxicity by increasing lithium levels.

Valproate provides mood stabilization with particular efficacy for rapid cycling, mixed states, and patients who do not respond adequately to lithium. Mechanism involves enhancement of GABAergic transmission and effects on voltage-gated sodium channels and intracellular signaling. Therapeutic levels range from fifty to one hundred twenty-five micrograms per milliliter. Common side effects include weight gain, sedation, tremor, hair loss, and gastrointestinal upset. Serious risks include hepatotoxicity requiring liver function monitoring, pancreatitis, and thrombocytopenia. Most critically, valproate is highly teratogenic causing neural tube defects in up to ten percent of exposed fetuses and neurodevelopmental effects, making it absolutely contraindicated in pregnancy and requiring careful counseling in women of childbearing potential.

Carbamazepine and lamotrigine provide additional mood stabilization options with distinct efficacy and safety profiles. Carbamazepine demonstrates antimanic efficacy but requires monitoring for hematological effects including agranulocytosis, hepatotoxicity, and hyponatremia, and has numerous drug interactions through CYP450 induction that can reduce levels of other medications. HLA-B*1502 screening is recommended in patients of Asian ancestry due to severe cutaneous reaction risk. Lamotrigine provides depression prevention with minimal weight gain and is generally well-tolerated, but carries risk of serious rash including Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis, requiring slow titration starting at twenty-five milligrams daily with increases every two weeks. Importantly, lamotrigine lacks antimanic efficacy and should not be used as monotherapy when manic episodes are a primary concern.



IX. Maintenance Treatment and Relapse Prevention

Maintenance treatment goals in bipolar disorder include preventing mood episode recurrence, minimizing subsyndromal symptoms and interepisode dysfunction, reducing suicide risk, and optimizing functional outcome and quality of life. Given the chronic, recurrent nature of bipolar disorder with over ninety percent recurrence rate, most patients require indefinite maintenance treatment after a first manic episode. Treatment discontinuation after a period of stability frequently results in relapse, often within months, emphasizing the importance of long-term treatment commitment. The medication that achieved acute stabilization typically continues into maintenance, though doses may be adjusted.

Lithium has the strongest evidence for maintenance treatment, with documented efficacy for preventing both manic and depressive episodes and unique evidence for suicide risk reduction that persists even after accounting for treatment adherence and severity. Valproate provides maintenance efficacy, particularly for patients who responded well during acute treatment and those with rapid cycling or mixed features. Lamotrigine excels at preventing depressive episodes with modest effects on preventing manic episodes, making it an excellent choice when depressive episodes predominate but an inadequate choice as monotherapy when mania is a significant concern. Combining mood stabilizers with different efficacy profiles addresses both poles of the illness.

Atypical antipsychotics approved for bipolar maintenance include olanzapine, risperidone long-acting injectable, aripiprazole, quetiapine, and ziprasidone, with varying evidence for preventing manic versus depressive episodes. These medications provide particular benefit for preventing manic and mixed episodes. Metabolic effects including weight gain, hyperglycemia, and dyslipidemia require regular monitoring and limit long-term tolerability for some patients. Long-acting injectable formulations of risperidone and aripiprazole provide options for patients with adherence difficulties. Combination treatment with a traditional mood stabilizer plus atypical antipsychotic may be necessary for patients with severe or frequent episodes who do not achieve adequate stability with monotherapy.

Psychoeducation and psychotherapy complement pharmacotherapy in maintenance treatment and improve long-term outcomes. Psychoeducation about the nature of bipolar disorder, importance of medication adherence, sleep hygiene, stress management, and early warning sign recognition empowers patients to participate actively in their care. Family-focused therapy involving patient and family members in education and communication skills training reduces relapse rates by improving the family environment. Cognitive behavioral therapy adapted for bipolar disorder helps with medication adherence, early intervention for prodromal symptoms, and management of residual symptoms. Interpersonal and social rhythm therapy emphasizes circadian rhythm regulation through consistent daily routines including sleep-wake times, meals, and activities. Support groups provide peer connection and normalization.



X. Special Populations and Prognosis

Bipolar disorder during pregnancy requires careful balancing of treatment risks against substantial risks of untreated illness. Untreated bipolar disorder during pregnancy carries risks including poor prenatal care, substance use, impaired mother-infant bonding, and high risk of postpartum psychosis. Valproate is absolutely contraindicated due to neural tube defects occurring in up to ten percent of exposed fetuses and long-term neurodevelopmental effects in offspring. Lithium carries risk of Ebstein anomaly affecting cardiac development, though absolute risk is lower than previously believed at approximately one in one thousand compared to one in twenty thousand baseline risk. Lamotrigine has relatively favorable reproductive safety data and may be considered. Atypical antipsychotics may be used with attention to metabolic effects. ECT is safe and effective during pregnancy for severe episodes. Preconception planning optimizes medication regimens before conception.

Pediatric bipolar disorder presents diagnostic challenges due to developmental differences in symptom presentation and overlap with other childhood conditions. Irritability represents the most common mood presentation in children rather than the classic euphoria of adult mania, creating diagnostic overlap with ADHD, oppositional defiant disorder, and disruptive mood dysregulation disorder. Careful assessment should document clear episodes distinct from baseline functioning, with hypomanic or manic symptoms clustering together during a defined period rather than chronic irritability. Treatment follows adult guidelines with attention to developmental considerations, though evidence in pediatric populations is more limited. Monitoring for medication effects on growth, metabolic parameters, and development is essential given the developing brain.

Comorbidity is extremely common in bipolar disorder and significantly impacts treatment and prognosis. Substance use disorders affect over fifty percent of bipolar patients and complicate treatment through direct destabilizing effects of substances, medication interactions, and reduced treatment adherence. Integrated treatment addressing both conditions simultaneously produces better outcomes than sequential treatment. Anxiety disorders affect forty to sixty percent of bipolar patients and may require specific attention with anxiolytic medication or psychotherapy. ADHD overlaps with and complicates diagnosis of bipolar disorder. Medical comorbidities including cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome occur at elevated rates partly due to medication effects and require monitoring and management.

The long-term prognosis of bipolar disorder has improved substantially with modern treatment but remains guarded. Functional recovery often lags behind symptomatic recovery, with many patients experiencing persistent occupational and social impairment even during euthymic periods. Suicide remains a major cause of mortality, with fifteen to twenty percent lifetime mortality in untreated patients reduced but not eliminated with treatment, underscoring the importance of ongoing risk assessment and lithium when tolerated for its antisuicidal effects. Positive prognostic factors include good interepisode functioning, treatment adherence, strong social support, absence of rapid cycling or substance use, and insight into the illness. Early intervention and aggressive maintenance treatment provide the best opportunity for favorable long-term outcome.



Summary

• Bipolar I requires at least one manic episode lasting at least one week or requiring hospitalization; bipolar II requires hypomania plus major depression with no lifetime mania
• DIGFAST captures manic symptoms: Distractibility, Indiscretion, Grandiosity, Flight of ideas, Activity increase, Sleep decrease, Talkativeness
• Hypomania differs from mania in duration requirement of four consecutive days minimum and absence of marked impairment, hospitalization, or psychosis
• Mixed features specifier indicates at least three opposite-pole symptoms during an episode, carrying substantially higher suicide risk
• Rapid cycling defined as four or more episodes in twelve months; responds poorly to lithium and may be worsened by antidepressants
• Acute mania treatment includes lithium, valproate, or atypical antipsychotics, often in combination for severe presentations
• Bipolar depression first-line treatments include quetiapine, lurasidone, and lamotrigine; avoid antidepressant monotherapy due to destabilization risk
• Lithium requires regular level and thyroid and renal monitoring; therapeutic maintenance level is 0.6 to 1.0 mEq/L; reduces suicide risk
• Valproate is absolutely contraindicated in pregnancy due to neural tube defects; lamotrigine requires slow titration to reduce Stevens-Johnson syndrome risk
• Lifelong maintenance treatment is typically needed; suicide risk is fifteen to twenty percent without treatment

Key Terms

This content is subject to the MIT License. © 2024–2026 Hibbert School of Medicine.

Read this lecture as Markdown