Residency · Residency · Oral Maxillofacial Surgery
Panfacial Fractures: Sequencing and Strategy
Overview
Panfacial fractures involve simultaneous fractures of the upper face, midface, and lower face (mandible). They result from high-energy mechanisms including MVC, falls from height, ballistic injuries, and industrial accidents. These represent the most complex facial trauma scenario for the OMFS surgeon. No single stable anatomic reference exists because all three facial zones are disrupted. Successful management requires systematic planning, careful sequencing, and restoration of facial width, height, and projection.
Definition
Panfacial fractures involve fractures in at least two of the three facial zones: the upper face (frontal sinus, frontal bar, superior orbits), the midface (Le Fort fractures, ZMC, orbits, NOE, nasal bones), and the lower face (mandible at any subsite). Some definitions require involvement of all three zones. The hallmark challenge is the loss of all stable anatomic reference points for reconstruction.
Principles of Panfacial Fracture Repair
Three-Dimensional Restoration
Width is restored through the zygomatic arches and mandibular angles. Height is restored through the vertical buttresses (nasomaxillary, zygomaticomaxillary). Projection is restored through the malar eminence, chin, and nasal dorsum. Failure to restore any one dimension leads to a characteristic facial deformity.
Anatomic Reference Points
In panfacial fractures, no reliable reference point may exist. The surgeon must establish a reference framework using the occlusion (if teeth are present and undamaged), the cranial base (if the upper face is relatively intact), the mandibular condyles (if not fractured), or the zygomatic arches (key to facial width). Intraoperative assessment of symmetry is critical, with comparison of both sides.
Sequencing Strategies
Bottom-Up Approach
The bottom-up approach begins with mandible reconstruction (establishing lower facial width and anterior projection), followed by MMF (occlusion as reference), midface reconstruction (maxillary buttresses, ZMC, orbits), and upper face (frontal sinus, NOE). This approach uses the mandible as a stable platform and the occlusion to guide maxillary position. However, if the mandible is comminuted, it may not provide a reliable reference, and condylar fractures can confound mandibular positioning.
Top-Down Approach
The top-down approach begins with frontal bar and upper face reconstruction (establishing a cranial reference), followed by zygomatic arches (establishing facial width), midface reconstruction (buttresses hung from the stable upper face), and mandible last. This approach uses the cranial base as a fixed reference and is useful when the mandible is severely comminuted. However, mandibular occlusion is addressed last, and occlusal discrepancies are corrected at the end.
Inside-Out Approach
The inside-out approach begins with palate and dental arch integrity (restoring maxillary arch form), followed by MMF (establishing occlusion), medial structures (NOE, nasal septum, medial orbital walls), lateral structures (zygomatic arches, ZMC), and upper and lower face. This approach addresses the internal framework first and ensures correct arch dimensions, but may not restore facial width adequately if arches are not addressed early.
Combined/Hybrid Approach (Most Common in Practice)
Experienced surgeons use elements of all three approaches. General principles include establishing occlusion (MMF) early, identifying and starting from the most stable skeletal reference, working outward from known to unknown, restoring facial width (arches) early in the sequence, and fine-tuning projection and height with midface buttress repair.
Comparison of Sequencing Strategies
| Approach | Starting Point | Sequence | Best When | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bottom-Up | Mandible | Mandible → MMF → Midface → Upper face | Mandible is intact or reducible; teeth present for occlusal reference | Comminuted mandible unreliable as reference; condylar fractures confound positioning |
| Top-Down | Frontal bar/cranial base | Upper face → Arches → Midface → Mandible | Mandible severely comminuted; cranial base intact | Occlusion addressed last; occlusal discrepancies corrected at end |
| Inside-Out | Palate/dental arch | Palate → MMF → Medial structures → Lateral structures | Palatal split present; arch form disrupted | May not restore facial width if arches not addressed early |
| Combined/Hybrid | Most stable reference | Variable, surgeon-directed | Most clinical scenarios | Requires experience to identify optimal starting point |

Preoperative Planning
Imaging
CT face with axial, coronal, sagittal, and 3D reconstruction is mandatory. CT head evaluates intracranial injury. CT angiography is obtained if vascular injury is suspected. 3D printed models may aid surgical planning in complex cases.
Virtual Surgical Planning
Mirror imaging of the uninjured side templates the reconstruction. Plates are pre-bent on 3D models. Patient-specific cutting guides and reconstruction plates can be fabricated. VSP has a growing role in panfacial fracture management.
Medical Optimization
Panfacial fractures are associated with significant polytrauma. Neurosurgical, ophthalmologic, and general trauma clearance are obtained before definitive repair. Definitive repair is typically performed at 5-10 days, allowing medical stabilization and swelling reduction. Temporary measures include MMF, wound care, and airway management.
Surgical Approach
Access
The coronal incision is standard for upper and middle face access (frontal sinus, orbits, arches, NOE). An upper buccal sulcus incision accesses midface buttresses and the piriform rim. Transconjunctival or subtarsal incisions access the orbital floor and infraorbital rim. Mandibular vestibular incisions access the symphysis and body. Submandibular or retromandibular incisions access the angle, ramus, and condyle. A preauricular incision accesses the condyle and TMJ. Existing lacerations are utilized when appropriate.
Intraoperative Assessment
Frequent reassessment of facial symmetry uses the bird's-eye view, worm's-eye view, and frontal view. Zygomatic arch positions are compared bilaterally. Occlusion is checked repeatedly during repair. Intraoperative CT or navigation should be considered for complex cases.
Fixation
Miniplate fixation at all buttresses uses 1.5-2.0 mm systems. Reconstruction plates (2.4 mm) are used for comminuted mandibular segments. Lag screws are placed where appropriate (parasymphysis). Bone grafting addresses gaps and comminuted areas using calvarial or iliac crest sources. Titanium mesh is used for orbital wall reconstruction.
Management of Specific Challenges
Comminuted Mandible
If the mandible cannot serve as a reliable reference, the top-down approach is used. A reconstruction plate provides load-bearing fixation, and bone grafting addresses segmental defects.
Palatal Split
Palatal split must be addressed early because it determines maxillary arch width. A palatal plate or arch bar fixation reduces the sagittal fracture. If missed, the maxilla will be expanded and the occlusion will be incorrect.
Condylar Fractures in Panfacial Trauma
Bilateral condylar fractures with midface fractures result in loss of both posterior facial height references. ORIF of at least one condyle should be considered to establish ramus height. If both condyles are treated closed, the mandible may shorten, leading to anterior open bite.
Loss of Teeth and Occlusal Reference
Edentulous or severely traumatized dentition eliminates the occlusal reference. Dentures, Gunning splints, or occlusal reconstruction may be needed to establish a reference. Pre-injury dental records or photographs are invaluable.
Soft Tissue Management
Soft tissue degloving frequently accompanies high-energy panfacial fractures. Meticulous soft tissue re-draping over the repaired skeleton is essential. Suspension sutures (alar base cinch, V-Y closure, lip repositioning) are used. Temporary tarsorrhaphy protects the cornea if periorbital swelling is severe.

Post-Operative Management
Airway management may require elective tracheostomy in severe cases. MMF with guiding elastics is maintained for 4-6 weeks. A soft diet is followed for 8-12 weeks. Serial imaging assesses healing and hardware position. Long-term follow-up monitors occlusion, facial symmetry, orbital function, and nasal airway.
Complications
Malunion and malocclusion are the most common complications and may require secondary orthognathic surgery. Facial asymmetry results from inadequate restoration of width or projection. Enophthalmos comes from inadequate orbital volume correction. Telecanthus results from the NOE component not being adequately addressed. Nasal obstruction occurs from septal deviation or mucosal scarring. Hardware exposure or infection has higher rates in comminuted, contaminated fractures. Nonunion is rare with adequate fixation and bone grafting. Plate palpability is an issue especially in thin patients. Trismus occurs from scarring or coronoid impingement. Chronic pain and dysesthesia may also develop.
Clinical Pearls
There is no single "correct" sequencing -- the best approach uses the most stable available reference point and works outward. The zygomatic arches are the key to facial width, and if they are comminuted and not reduced, the face will be too narrow or too wide. The palate should always be checked for a sagittal fracture because this is commonly missed and leads to maxillary widening. The occlusion is the most reliable soft tissue reference when teeth are present, so MMF should be established early and checked frequently. The contralateral side should be used for comparison whenever possible, and mirror imaging with VSP is invaluable. Bilateral condylar fractures in panfacial trauma are a special challenge, and ORIF of at least one condyle establishes posterior facial height. Staged procedures should be planned, as not everything needs to be done at the first operation; soft tissue, nasal dorsum, and minor revisions can be addressed secondarily. Meticulous photographic documentation at each stage is essential for planning revisions and medicolegal purposes. Over-reduction is better than under-reduction for most structures, as under-correction of facial width and projection is the most common error.

References
- Kelly KJ, et al. Sequencing Le Fort fracture treatment: organizational management for the panfacial fracture. J Craniofac Surg. 1990.
- Markowitz BL, et al. Panfacial fractures: organization of treatment. Clin Plast Surg. 1989.
- Curtis W, Horswell BB. Panfacial fractures: an approach to management. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2013.
- Wenig BL. Management of panfacial fractures. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1991.
- Follmar KE, et al. A clinically applicable system for classifying panfacial fractures. J Craniofac Surg. 2007.
- Yang R, et al. Panfacial fracture management: current evidence and controversies. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2020.
