# Electrodiagnostic Studies in Pain Medicine

## Overview

Electrodiagnostic studies -- comprising nerve conduction studies (NCS) and needle electromyography (EMG) -- are extensions of the neurological examination that assess the functional integrity of the peripheral nervous system. In pain medicine, they are indispensable for confirming neuropathic pain diagnoses, localizing lesions along the neuraxis, differentiating radiculopathy from plexopathy and peripheral neuropathy, and guiding interventional treatment decisions. Understanding their indications, interpretation, and inherent limitations is essential for every pain medicine trainee.

## Nerve Conduction Studies (NCS)

### Principles

NCS evaluate the function of large myelinated motor and sensory fibers. A nerve is stimulated electrically at one point and the resulting electrical response is recorded at another. A critical limitation for pain medicine is that NCS do not assess small fiber (A-delta and C fiber) function -- the very fibers most relevant to pain transmission.

### Motor NCS

In motor NCS, a peripheral nerve is stimulated at two or more points along its course, and the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) is recorded from a muscle innervated by that nerve. Several parameters are measured. The distal latency is the time from distal stimulation to CMAP onset and reflects distal conduction. The CMAP amplitude reflects the number of functioning motor axons and thus axonal integrity. Conduction velocity, calculated as the distance between stimulation sites divided by the latency difference, reflects myelin integrity. F-wave latency is a late response from antidromic activation of the anterior horn cell that assesses the proximal nerve segment and is useful in radiculopathy and Guillain-Barre syndrome.

Two patterns of abnormality are important to recognize. A demyelinating pattern shows prolonged distal latency, slowed conduction velocity, conduction block, and temporal dispersion, with initially preserved CMAP amplitude. An axonal pattern shows reduced CMAP amplitude with relatively preserved conduction velocity and distal latency.

### Sensory NCS

Sensory NCS stimulate and record over a purely sensory or mixed nerve, producing a sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) whose amplitude reflects the number of functioning sensory axons. The critical diagnostic application is that the SNAP is preserved in radiculopathy (because the lesion is proximal to the dorsal root ganglion) but reduced or absent in plexopathy and peripheral neuropathy (where the lesion is at or distal to the DRG). This SNAP preservation rule is the electrodiagnostic cornerstone for distinguishing radiculopathy from plexopathy.

### Specialized NCS Techniques

The H-reflex is an electrically evoked monosynaptic reflex analogous to the Achilles tendon reflex. It primarily assesses the S1 nerve root and is useful early in S1 radiculopathy when other NCS parameters are still normal. F-waves assess proximal nerve segments and are prolonged or absent in radiculopathy, plexopathy, and proximal neuropathies such as Guillain-Barre syndrome. Repetitive nerve stimulation evaluates neuromuscular junction disorders like myasthenia gravis and Lambert-Eaton syndrome and is not routinely used in pain medicine but matters in differential diagnosis.



## Needle Electromyography (EMG)

### Principles

In needle EMG, a concentric or monopolar needle electrode is inserted into muscle to record motor unit action potentials (MUAPs) and assess spontaneous activity. This technique evaluates the functional status of the entire motor unit: anterior horn cell, motor axon, neuromuscular junction, and muscle fiber.

### Examination Components

#### Insertional Activity

Normal insertional activity is a brief burst of electrical activity upon needle insertion or movement. Increased insertional activity is an early sign of denervation. Decreased insertional activity suggests fibrosis, severe atrophy, or end-stage myopathy.

#### Spontaneous Activity

At rest, muscle should normally be electrically silent except at the endplate zone. Fibrillation potentials and positive sharp waves (PSWs) are spontaneous discharges of denervated individual muscle fibers that indicate active denervation from axonal injury. They appear 2-3 weeks after nerve injury (not immediately), are graded from 1+ to 4+ based on density, and are present in radiculopathy, plexopathy, peripheral neuropathy, and motor neuron disease. Fasciculation potentials are spontaneous discharges of an entire motor unit, seen in motor neuron disease (ALS), radiculopathy, and benign fasciculations. Complex repetitive discharges (CRDs) are time-locked, machine-like repetitive discharges that suggest chronicity of denervation (greater than six months). Myotonic discharges have waxing and waning frequency and amplitude (producing the characteristic "dive bomber" sound) and are seen in myotonic dystrophy and myotonia congenita.

#### Voluntary Motor Unit Analysis

MUAP morphology reveals the underlying pathology. Neuropathic MUAPs are large in amplitude, long in duration, and polyphasic, reflecting collateral reinnervation where surviving motor axons sprout to adopt denervated muscle fibers. Myopathic MUAPs are small in amplitude, short in duration, and polyphasic, reflecting loss of muscle fibers within the motor unit. Recruitment pattern also differentiates neurogenic from myopathic processes: reduced recruitment (fewer motor units firing at higher rates) indicates a neurogenic process, while early recruitment (many motor units firing at low force levels) indicates a myopathic process.

## Electrodiagnostic Approach to Specific Conditions

### Radiculopathy

Radiculopathy is the most common indication for electrodiagnostic studies in pain medicine. The key findings are fibrillations and PSWs in a myotomal distribution -- that is, in muscles that share the same nerve root but are innervated by different peripheral nerves. This pattern distinguishes radiculopathy from a single peripheral nerve lesion. Fibrillations in the paraspinal muscles strongly support radiculopathy over plexopathy or peripheral neuropathy because the paraspinal muscles are innervated by the posterior primary rami, which branch off before the plexus. The SNAP is preserved because the lesion is proximal to the DRG (preganglionic).

Timing is critical: EMG is most sensitive 3-4 weeks after the onset of radiculopathy. Fibrillations in the paraspinal muscles appear first (at about 2-3 weeks), followed by fibrillations in proximal and then distal limb muscles. The sensitivity of EMG for radiculopathy is only about 50-70%, because EMG detects only motor axon injury (many radiculopathies are primarily sensory or compressive without axon loss), purely demyelinating lesions may not produce fibrillations, and chronic radiculopathy with completed reinnervation may show only MUAP changes without active fibrillations.

### Key Myotomal Patterns for Radiculopathy Localization

| Root | Key Muscles | Reflex | Sensory |
|------|------------|--------|---------|
| C5 | Deltoid, infraspinatus, biceps | Biceps | Lateral arm |
| C6 | Biceps, pronator teres, FCR | Brachioradialis | Lateral forearm, thumb |
| C7 | Triceps, FCR, EDC, pronator teres | Triceps | Middle finger |
| C8 | FDP, FDI, ADM | None reliable | Medial forearm, ring/small finger |
| L4 | Vastus medialis, tibialis anterior | Patellar | Medial leg |
| L5 | Tibialis anterior, EHL, tibialis posterior, gluteus medius | None reliable | Lateral leg, dorsum of foot |
| S1 | Gastrocnemius, gluteus maximus, biceps femoris (short head) | Achilles | Lateral foot |



### Plexopathy

Brachial or lumbosacral plexopathy produces fibrillations in muscles innervated by multiple nerves and roots within the affected plexus trunk, division, or cord. Two findings distinguish plexopathy from radiculopathy: the SNAP is reduced or absent (because the lesion is at or distal to the DRG) and the paraspinal muscles are normal (because the posterior primary rami branch off before the plexus).

Common causes include trauma (brachial plexus traction injury), radiation (delayed radiation plexopathy), tumor infiltration (Pancoast tumor), diabetic amyotrophy (lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy), and idiopathic brachial neuritis (Parsonage-Turner syndrome). A classic electrodiagnostic application is distinguishing radiation plexopathy (which produces myokymic discharges, preferentially affects the upper trunk, and is typically painless) from tumor infiltration (no myokymic discharges, lower trunk predominance, and painful).

### Entrapment Neuropathy

Carpal tunnel syndrome (median neuropathy at the wrist) is the most common entrapment neuropathy. Electrodiagnostic findings include prolonged median distal sensory latency (greater than 3.5 ms or more than 0.4 ms difference from ulnar), prolonged median distal motor latency (greater than 4.4 ms), reduced median SNAP amplitude in severe cases reflecting axonal loss, and fibrillations in thenar muscles in severe cases only. Severity grading guides treatment: mild cases are managed conservatively, moderate cases may warrant surgery, and severe cases with axon loss require surgical decompression.

Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow shows conduction velocity slowing across the elbow segment (below 50 m/s) and CMAP amplitude drop greater than 20% across the elbow. Peroneal neuropathy at the fibular head shows conduction block or slowing across the fibular head and causes foot drop. A key differential point: peroneal neuropathy spares tibialis posterior and foot inversion (because tibialis posterior is innervated by the tibial nerve), while L5 radiculopathy affects it (because tibialis posterior shares the L5 root).

### Polyneuropathy

Length-dependent polyneuropathy shows reduced distal SNAP and CMAP amplitudes with relative sparing of proximal nerves. The axonal versus demyelinating distinction guides the differential diagnosis. Axonal polyneuropathy (the most common type, caused by diabetic, toxic, and metabolic etiologies) shows reduced amplitudes with preserved velocities. Demyelinating polyneuropathy (Guillain-Barre syndrome, CIDP) shows slowed velocities, prolonged distal latencies, conduction block, and temporal dispersion.

Small fiber neuropathy is a critical gap: NCS and EMG are completely normal because they test only large fibers. Diagnosis requires skin punch biopsy measuring intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD), autonomic testing such as QSART, or corneal confocal microscopy. This is the most commonly missed neuropathic pain diagnosis -- burning pain with normal NCS and EMG should prompt small fiber neuropathy workup, not reassurance that "the nerve test was normal."

## Limitations of Electrodiagnostic Studies

Several limitations must be understood. NCS and EMG only test large myelinated fibers, meaning small fiber neuropathies (the most relevant to pain) are entirely missed. The studies are timing-dependent, with fibrillations appearing 2-3 weeks after injury, so testing too early produces false negatives. Sensitivity for radiculopathy is moderate at approximately 50-70%, so a normal EMG does not exclude radiculopathy. The studies are uncomfortable for patients (needle EMG is painful and NCS involve electrical stimulation), which limits acceptance and cooperation. Results are operator-dependent, and interpretation quality varies significantly between laboratories. Finally, electrodiagnostic studies cannot identify the cause of pain directly -- they identify nerve dysfunction, and correlation with the clinical presentation is essential.

## Ordering and Interpreting EDX Studies

When ordering electrodiagnostic studies, always specify the clinical question: "rule out L5 radiculopathy" is far more useful than "pain in the leg." When reviewing results, examine the raw data rather than relying solely on the impression or conclusion -- look at individual nerve parameters and muscle sampling. Correlate EDX abnormalities with clinical findings, as abnormalities in clinically asymptomatic distributions may be incidental. For timing, order EMG no earlier than 3 weeks after symptom onset for acute radiculopathy and 2-4 weeks for acute nerve injury. EDX provides functional information while MRI provides anatomical information -- they are complementary, not redundant, and together give a much more complete picture than either alone.



## Clinical Pearls

The SNAP preservation rule is the single most important electrodiagnostic principle for pain physicians: a normal SNAP in the distribution of a sensory complaint localizes the lesion to the nerve root (preganglionic), while an absent SNAP indicates a lesion at or distal to the DRG (plexopathy or peripheral neuropathy). A normal EMG does not exclude radiculopathy -- sensitivity is only 50-70%, and purely sensory or compressive radiculopathies without axonal loss will produce a normal study. Clinical correlation with history, examination, and imaging is mandatory. When EMG and NCS are normal but the patient has burning pain, numbness, and autonomic symptoms in a length-dependent pattern, pursue a small fiber neuropathy workup (skin biopsy for IENFD) -- this is the most commonly missed neuropathic pain diagnosis. In the painful foot drop differential, check tibialis posterior function: weakness indicates L5 radiculopathy (tibialis posterior is tibial nerve but L5 root), while preservation indicates peroneal neuropathy at the fibular head.

## References

1. Dumitru D, Amato AA, Zwarts MJ. *Electrodiagnostic Medicine*. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus; 2002.
2. Wilbourn AJ, Aminoff MJ. AAEM minimonograph 32: the electrodiagnostic examination in patients with radiculopathies. *Muscle Nerve*. 1998;21(12):1612-1631.
3. England JD, Gronseth GS, Franklin G, et al. Practice parameter: evaluation of distal symmetric polyneuropathy: role of autonomic testing, nerve biopsy, and skin biopsy. *Neurology*. 2009;72(2):177-184.
4. Werner RA, Andary M. Electrodiagnostic evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome. *Muscle Nerve*. 2011;44(4):597-607.